Page 18 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider
P. 18
Harun Yahya
The record of evolution is still surprisingly jerky and, ironically, we have even
fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin’s time. By this
I mean that the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the
evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be modified or discared as
a result of more detailed information. What appeared to be a nice simple progres-
sion when relatively few data were available now appears to be much more com-
plex and less gradualistic. So Darwin's problem has not been alleviated. 2
David Raup, an evolutionist paleontologist at the University of Chicago
In 1859, the theory of evolution, developed in a climate of terrible
ignorance and emerged with a claim that people had never heard of be-
fore. That was the hypothesis that all living things evolved from one
another as a result of completely random natural events, with no con-
scious divine intervention involved. Charles Darwin wrote his book
The Origin of Species to showcase his theory’s main idea, that living
things are able to develop into other living species. On the basis of his
completely imaginary scenarios, he attempted vainly to oppose the fact
that living things are actually created.
16
