Page 20 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Harun Yahya

known molecular systems. The huge advances in the science of genetics
revealed extraordinary structures such as DNA, and countless more spe-
cies were discovered on Earth, all of which Darwinists would have to ac-
count for. In addition, the fossil record provided not a single example of
the semi-developed life forms that the theory of evolution predicted.
Actually, the record showed that species that had existed in the past and
had even been described as transitional forms were still alive in the pre-
sent, having undergone no changes whatsoever.
The theory of evolution could not answer any of the questions that had
arisen since Darwin’s time. It completely lacked any supporting evidence.
The search for a miracle that Darwin initiated is still being carried

out by evolutionists today. Yet in all that time, there has not been one sin-
gle development or discovery in favor of the theory of evolution. Quite
the contrary, countless indisputable proofs have demonstrated its invalid-
ity. Yet in their quest, Darwinists refuse to make any concessions. There
are millions of questions that evolutionists need to answer. How did enor-
mously sensitive systematic structures and the extraordinary complexity
in life forms—which evolutionists maintain are evolved from one an-
other—all come into being? No explanation has been offered of
how the fictitious mechanisms of evolution actually work, or
how they could have created life from nothing, or how one
species could “evolve” into another totally different one.
Darwin’s theory cannot account for a single protein in liv-
ing things.
Present-day Darwinists, whose hopes have
constantly been dashed over the years, still
maintain their absolute and essential faith in
miracles and take no interest in the subjects
they cannot explain. They say that the sub-

lime attributes of countless living things all
came about through luck. Asked who
it was who wrought that luck,

18