Page 229 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider
P. 229
Adnan Oktar
ids) present in the structure of proteins.
Barely a few years had passed before it was revealed that this ex-
periment, which was then presented as an important step in the name
of evolution, was invalid, for the atmosphere used in the experiment
was very different from the real Earth conditions. 80
After a long silence, Miller confessed that the atmosphere medi-
um he used was unrealistic. 81
All the evolutionists' efforts throughout the twentieth century to
explain the origin of life ended in failure. The geochemist Jeffrey
Bada, from the San Diego Scripps Institute accepts this fact in an article
published in Earth magazine in 1998:
Today as we leave the twentieth century, we still face the biggest un-
solved problem that we had when we entered the twentieth century:
How did life originate on Earth? 82
c
x
l
e
r
u
S
t
L
f
e
f
i
r
u
t
o
e
p
e
h
T The Complex Structure of Life
m
o
C
The primary reason why the theory of evolution ended up in such
a great impasse regarding the origin of life is that even those living or-
ganisms deemed to be the simplest have incredibly complex structures.
The cell of a living thing is more complex than all of our man-made
technological products. Today, even in the most de-
veloped laboratories of the world, a living cell
cannot be produced by bringing organic
chemicals together.
The conditions required for the forma-
tion of a cell are too great in quantity to be
explained away by coincidences. The
probability of proteins, the building
blocks of a cell, being synthesized coinci-
dentally, is 1 in 10 950 for an average protein
made up of 500 amino acids. In mathematics, a
Stanley Miller
227