Page 234 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Harun Yahya

ry, they are always harmful.
The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex struc-
ture, and random effects can only harm it. The American geneticist B.

G. Ranganathan explains this as follows:
First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most muta-
tions are harmful since they are random, rather than orderly changes in
the structure of genes; any random change in a highly ordered system
will be for the worse, not for the better. For example, if an earthquake
were to shake a highly ordered structure such as a building, there
would be a random change in the framework of the building which, in

all probability, would not be an improvement. 86
Not surprisingly, no mutation example, which is useful, that is,
which is observed to develop the genetic code, has been observed so
far. All mutations have proved to be harmful. It was understood that

mutation, which is presented as an "evolutionary mechanism," is actu-
ally a genetic occurrence that harms living things, and leaves them dis-
abled. (The most common effect of mutation on human beings is can-

There exists not one single fossil specimen to confirm
the idea that plants evolved, though there are hun-
dreds of thousands of fossils that prove that evolution
never happened. One of these is the 37-54-million-
year-old ginkgo leaf fossil illustrated. Ginkgos have
not changed for millions of years and show that evolu-
tion is a huge deception.

232