Page 33 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Adnan Oktar

Murray Eden, professor of electrical engineering at MIT delivered a paper on
“The Inadequacy of Neo-Darwinian Evolution as a Scientific Theory.” Eden
stated that if it required a mere six mutations to bring about an adaptive change,
this would occur by chance once in a billion years, while if two dozen genes were
involved, it would require 10 billion years, which is much longer that the age of
the earth. 9
Gordon Rattray Taylor, British science writer

In claiming that life emerged as the result of blind chance,
Darwinists never realize that the odds against a single, average-sized
protein molecule forming by chance are 10 300 to one.
And the chances of a functional protein forming by chance are
1 in 10 950
In analyzing these probabilities, Darwinists never realize that
50
probabilities smaller than 1 in 10 are mathematically impossible.
Darwinists never realize that the cell, which they maintain
came into being by chance and which—given the state of 19th century
technology—they regarded as a balloon filled with water, has a struc-
ture as complex as that of New York City.

Darwinists never realize that the power station known as the
mitochondrion inside the cell, itself no larger than 1/100 millimeters, is
far more complex than an oil refinery or hydroelectric station.
Darwinists never realize that an identical DNA molecule exists
in every one of the 100 trillion cells that constitute the human body and
contains enough data to fill 1 million encyclopedia pages. Darwinists
maintain that they came into being as the re-
sult of blind coincidences.
Darwinists never realize how the
unconscious atoms that comprise DNA de-
termine the specialization of cells in the eye,
hair, bones, skin, stomach and other areas.

Not even a single protein can form by chance.
Darwinists are unable to explain how the building
blocks of life could have emerged by way of evolu-
tion.
31