Page 38 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Harun Yahya

DNA, the cell’s data bank,
functions just like a planning cen-
ter, assuming the responsibilities
of a large number of expert art-
ists, scientists, architects, engi-
neers, botanists, interior
designers, painters,
doctors, and many
more.
Has there been “progress” in
evolution? Are recent plants
and animals more advanced than
their predecessors or, at least, more
complex? Alas, no. Of course it is
Cytochrome-C true that a bacterium is a simpler crea-
ture than a cassowary or an elephant , in that
it has fewer moving parts, but its DNA is as richly en-
dowed as an elephant’s, and it functions as well in its own circumstances as any
vertebrate does. It might even be argued that certain bacteria do their job a lot
better than any other animals, since they can claim an unbroken line of descent
that can be traced for 3 billion years, while every other known life form has al-
ready died out or is scheduled to do so. 14
Richard Ellis, evolutionist and marine biologist
Darwinists never question how proteins can know such vital
functions as DNA replication, production of information and cell divi-
sion.
Darwinists maintain that proteins came into being by chance,
and though devoid of any consciousness or intelligence, can construct
all the chemical components of the cell by working as a team, break the
cell down when necessary and reconstitute these small components as
simple compounds for later use.
Darwinists never realize that in order for the countless pro-

36