Page 41 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Adnan Oktar

To the side can be seen an amino acid chain with a side chain. If any of the amino ac-
ids in the chain were to be missing or change place, this protein molecule would be-
come functionless. This chain is therefore very definitely the result of a plan, not of co-
incidence.

Darwinists never explain why the nerve cell—which they
claim came into being as the result of blind coincidences—should feel
the need to convert an aroma into an electrical signal.
Darwinists never explain how the body can halt production
when the level of iron rises, how it is able to behave in a seemingly in-
telligent manner, which can never be explained by the theory of evolu-

tion in any way.
From the first cell that coalesced in the primordial soup to the magnificent intri-
cacies of Homo sapiens, the evolution of life—as everyone knows—has been one
long drive toward greater complexity. The only trouble with what everyone
knows. . . is that there is no evidence it’s true. 16
Lori Oliwenstein, one of the senior editors of Discover magazine
Darwinists never explain how a protein could have formed by
chance in muddy water, how a second protein joined onto the first, and
then a third, or how this whole impossible system continued. It is im-

possible for them all to come together by chance, become alive and give
rise to a cell.
Darwinists can never explain how the nucleus in the cell,
which they claim formed as the result of chance processes, came into
being. And even if this happened, how did it become a living entity?

39