Page 39 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Adnan Oktar

teins involved in the process of vision to function, they must have the
appropriate molecular structure, which could never have come about
by chance.
Darwinists never explain how the molecules in the retina’s
cone cells come together to constitute proteins that make color vision
possible, nor how it is that these proteins have shared the same struc-
ture and functioned impeccably in all the human beings who have ev-
er lived over millions of years.
In claiming that molecules came into being by chance,

Darwinists never explain how they could have given rise to the protein
melanin that protects the eye from the harmful ultraviolet rays.
Darwinists never realize that proteins, made up of only 20 of
the more than 200 amino acids in nature, can never account for such an
intelligent selectivity.
Darwinists never acknowledge that not a single right-handed
amino acid is to be found in living organisms, nor how such an intelli-
gent selectivity could have come about.
Molecular evolution is about to be accepted as a method superior to paleontology
for the discovery of evolutionary relationships. As a molecular evolutionist, I
should be elated. Instead, it seems disconcerting that many exceptions exist to the
orderly progression of species as determined by molecular homologies: so many,
in fact, that I think the exception, the quirks, may carry the more important mes-
sage. 15
Christian Schwabe, Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at the
University of South Carolina
Darwinists never realize how 20 from the more than 200 ami-
no acids in nature must be accurately selected in order to form proteins,
why they are all left-handed and in the correct sequence, nor how this
intelligent selection could have come into being.
The odds of proteins emerging from left-handed amino acids
210
only are 1 in 10 , that the probability of this happening is effectively
zero, and it cannot have come about by chance.

37