Page 58 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Harun Yahya

Darwinists never appreciate the superior qualities of ants,
which live in colonies, possess a very powerful communications net-
work, produce and store food, protect their young in the event of an at-
tack and fight to defend their colonies.
Darwinists never proclaim that when examined under a mi-
croscope, a lobster’s eye resembles a flawless piece of graph paper, and
that lobsters see using the reflection, rather than the refraction princi-
ple.
Darwinists never point out that throughout the winter, bacte-
ria in lakes break down organic wastes that sink to the bottom and con-
vert them into minerals, thus preparing the nutrients for nature to use
again in the spring.
Darwinists never consider that the structure of living things is
too perfect and complex to come about by chance. They never consid-

er that three of the 23 species of bird capable of learning to sing (the
parrot, canary and flycatcher) are far distant from one another, accord-
ing to evolutionists’ imaginary familial relations. This totally discredits
their scenarios. It is quite irrational to imagine that such complex abili-
ties could be acquired by chance by even a single species of bird, let
alone by 23.
Darwinists fail to consider that in addition to fireflies, various
undersea life forms also produce their own light, and that they are com-
pletely different to one another in terms of the use they make of this
light, its duration and form. The complex structures capable of manu-
facturing light in living things without harming them can never emerge
as the result of chance.
Darwinists never acknowledge that bacteria, too small to be
seen with the naked eye, have mechanisms on their surfaces that emit

and perceive electrical signals. Thanks to these mechanisms, they trans-
mit information to one another, and it is impossible for such behavior,
requiring an intelligent mind, to have come into being by chance.

56