Page 112 - The Evolution Impasse 2
P. 112

110  Origin of Instinct



                  This the sis im plies that Nature is  Professor Cemal Yıldırım, one of
               a con scious force able to dis tin guish  Turkey's lead ing ev o lu tion ists, ad -
               be tween use ful and harm ful be hav -  mits that be hav ior such as a moth er's
               iors and of mak ing de ci sions. No  love for her young can not be ex -
               con scious ness or force in na ture is  plained by nat u ral se lec tion:
               ca pa ble of this dis tinc tion. An an i -  Is there any pos si bil i ty of ac count ing
               mal it self may de cide what be hav ior  for a moth er's love for her young
               is use ful, but it can not pass this in -  through any "blind" or der [nat u ral se -
               sight along through its genes alone.  lec tion] not in clud ing a spir it u al el e -
               Only an Entity pos sessed of con -    ment? It is cer tain ly hard to say that
               scious ness and rea son—name ly, the  bi ol o gists [at this point Darwinists]
                                                         have giv en a sat is fac to ry re ply to
               Creator of na ture and the life
                                                              this ques tion.  113
               form in ques tion—can make
               that se lec tion.                                    Since these or -
                  Darwin him self ad -                             gan isms,  lack ing
               mit ted the im pos si bil i -                        any rea son and
               ty of com plex and                                    fore sight,  have
               ben e fi cial   be hav ior                            a num ber of
               be ing      ac quired                                 mi rac u lous fea -
               through nat u ral se lec -                            tures; and since
               tion, al though he stat -                             it is not pos si ble
               ed that he per sist ed in                            for them to have
               that claim de spite it be -                         ac quired   these
               ing non sen si cal:                               fea tures of their
                                                               own will, some pow er
                  Finally it may not be a log i cal
                  de duc tion, but to my im ag i na tion it  must have be stowed these
                  is far more sat is fac to ry to look at such  fea tures on them. The mech a nism of
                  in stincts as the young cuck oo eject ing  nat u ral  se lec tion  and  na ture  it self
                  its fos ter-broth ers, ants mak ing slaves .  has no con scious ness and no such
                  . . not as spe cial ly en dowed or cre at ed  spir it u al fea tures, for which rea son
                  in stincts, but as small con se quen ces of  these can not be the source of the
                  one gen er al law lead ing to the ad -  char ac ter is tics these crea tures pos -
                  vance ment of all or gan ic be ings—
                                                   sess. The ob vi ous truth is this: all liv -
                  name ly, mul ti ply, vary, let the strong -
                                                   ing things ex ist by the will and un -
                  est live and the weak est die.  112
                                                   der the con trol of Allah. For this rea -

                                                               The Evolution Impasse II
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117