Page 113 - The Evolution Impasse 2
P. 113

Origin of Instinct  111



           son, we fre quent ly see ex ceed ing ly  can be clear ly shown that the most
           con scious and as ton ish ing be hav ior  won der ful in stincts with which we are
           in na ture, in hab it ed by un con scious  ac quaint ed, name ly, those of the hive-
           en ti ties, of the kind that makes peo -  bee and of many ants, could not pos si -
                                                 bly have been ac quired by hab it.   114
           ple ask. "How does this an i mal
           know how to do that?" or "How did     If a work ing ant or oth er neu ter in sect
           this crea ture ev er think of do ing  had been an or di nary an i mal, I should
           that?"                                have un hes i ta ting ly as sumed that all
              2. It is im pos si ble for be hav ior  its char ac ters had been slow ly ac quired
           ac quired through nat u ral se lec tion  through nat u ral se lec tion; name ly, by
                                                 in di vid u als  hav ing  been  born  with
           to be trans mit ted ge net i cal ly to sub -
                                                 slight prof it a ble mod i fi ca tions, which
           se quent gen er a tions.
                                                 were in her it ed by the off-spring; and
              In the sec ond phase of ev o lu tion -
                                                 that these again var ied and again were
           ists' claims, be hav ior ac quired
                                                 se lect ed, and so on wards. But with the
           through  nat u ral  se lec tion  must  be
                                                 work ing ant we have an in sect dif fer -
           ge net i cal ly hand ed on to sub se quent
                                                 ing great ly from its par ents, yet ab so -
           gen er a tions. However, such claims
                                                 lute ly ster ile; so that it could nev er
           are  full  of  var i ous  in con sist en cies.  have trans mit ted suc ces sive ly ac quired
           First, , even if an i mals learned be -  mod i fi ca tions of struc ture or in stinct
           hav ior through ex pe ri ence, it is im -  to its prog e ny. It may well be asked
           pos si ble for sub se quent ly ac quired  how is it pos si ble to rec on cile this case
           be hav ior to be passed on ge net i cal ly.  with the the o ry of nat u ral se lec tion?  115
           Learned be hav ior be longs unique ly
           to the an i mal that learned it. It is ab -
           so lute ly im pos si ble for any learned
           be hav ior to be en cod ed in to a liv ing
           thing's genes.
              Evolutionists to day are still un a -
           ble to re solve that same con tra dic -
           tion posed by Darwin 150 years ago:
              [I]t would be a se ri ous er ror to sup pose
              that the great er num ber of in stincts
              have been ac quired by hab it in one gen -
              er a tion, and then trans mit ted by in her -
              it ance  to  suc ceed ing  gen er a tions.  It


           Harun Yahya - Adnan Oktar
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118