Page 167 - The Dark Clan

165

The Deception Of Evolution

Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolution as
"homo," that is "man." According to their claim, the living beings
in the Homo series are more developed than Australopithecus.
Evolutionists devise a fanciful evolution scheme by arranging
different fossils of these creatures in a particular order. This
scheme is imaginary because it has never been proved that
there is an evolutionary relation between these different class-
es. Ernst Mayr, one of the twentieth century's most important
evolutionists, contends in his book One Long Argument that
"particularly historical [puzzles] such as the origin of life or of
Homo sapiens, are extremely difficult and may even resist a
final, satisfying explanation." 35
By outlining the link chain as Australopithecus > Homo habilis
> Homo erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionists imply that each of
these species is one another's ancestor. However, recent find-
ings of paleoanthropologists have revealed that
Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus lived at differ-
ent parts of the world at the same time. 36
Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo
erectus have lived up until very modern times. Homo sapiens
neandarthalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens (modern man) co-
existed in the same region. 37
This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of the
claim that they are ancestors of one another. A paleontologist
from Harvard University, Stephen Jay Gould, explains this
deadlock of the theory of evolution, although he is an evolu-

tionist himself:
What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lin-
eages of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines,
and H. habilis), none clearly derived from another? Moreover,
none of the three display any evolutionary trends during their
tenure on earth. 38