Page 21 - The Skulls That Demolish Darwin

THE SKULLS THAT DEMOLISH DARWIN

ists regard as being a primitive ancestor. If ev-
olutionists’ claims were true, the Malaysian
natives in question should have a structure
and appearance of humans who have recently
evolved from being apes and have not yet de-
veloped fully into Homo sapiens. Yet that is
not the case at all. The fact that anatomical fea-
tures of the H. erectus skull can still be seen to-
day shows that H. erectus was not a primitive
species and also, that evolutionists’ scenario of
the human family tree is a fiction.
In short, the fact that some past human ra-
ces had anatomical structures different from
human beings alive today in no way consti-
tutes evidence in favor of evolution.
Anatomical distinctions can be seen in all peri-
ods of recorded history and among all differ-
Features of the Homo
ent human races. Americans and Japanese,
erectus skull, such as
Europeans and Australian Aborigines,
the protrusions over
Eskimos and Negroes or Pygmies all have
the eyebrows and its
distinctively different skulls. But this does
backward-sloping
not mean that some of these races are any
brow, can also be seen
more developed or more backward than the
in certain present-day
others.
races, such as the na-
If, thousands of years in the future, scien-
tive Malaysian on the
tists discover the skull of an American who
left.
lived in the 2000s and was some 1.90 meters

An aboriginal race will preserve its charac-
teristic unless it becomes intermixed with an-
other race. It will not, for example, develop
into a Western European race. No matter
how much time elapses, these people will
never evolve in such a way as to acquire dif-
ferent characteristics; will never acquire a
greater skull size than the one they have
now, and will never acquire new anatomical
features.

1
9
A Adnan Oktar 19
t
k
r
a
a
n
d
O

n