Page 22 - The Skulls That Demolish Darwin

THE SKULLS THAT DEMOLISH DARWIN

tall, and compare it with the skull of a Japanese individual who also lived in the 2000s but was only
1.60 meters tall, they will observe a great many differences between them—first and foremost, in
terms of size. If, on the basis of these differences, they then suggest, that the Japanese were primitive
and that Americans were several rungs higher up the developmental ladder, of course they will be
making an interpretation that in no way reflects the true state of affairs.
In addition, skull volume is no criterion for measuring anyone’s intelligence or capacities. There
are many humans with well-developed bodies but insufficiently developed intelligence. In the same
way, many people have bodies and therefore, skulls, smaller than those of others, but who are nev-
ertheless highly intelligent. Their skulls cannot be evaluated by the scientists of the future, at least
not in a scientifically valid way and on the basis of dimensions alone, to set out any supposed evo-
lutionary line of progression—because that sequence will not reflect the true facts. Differences in
skull size are known to be totally unrelated to intelligence and ability. If someone spends his life in
intense mental activity, his skull will not grow in size. Only his mental abilities will get stronger..
Intelligence varies, not in relation to skull size, but according to the organization within the brain it-
self. 5
The following pages offer just a few examples of the countless fossil skulls that invalidate the the-
ory of evolution. These specimens all prove that no life form has ever changed during its natural his-
tory; they have all existed with the same features they enjoyed when they were first created. In ad-
dition to this evidence, this book also contains statements that indicate and emphasize the dilemmas
facing Darwinist thinking. For example, Darwinists, who illogically maintain that living things de-
velop by constant change, are asked to account for the evident stability in every fossil life form. The
theory of evolution, which suggests that human beings are allegedly descended from apes, has to ex-
plain why no process, similar to the imaginary one it claims took place in apes, occurred in other life
forms. Evolutionists have no answer as to why a bear did not one day decide to walk on two legs,
why a fox did not raise its level of intelligence enough to become a professor, or why a panda never
became a composer writing stupendous symphonies. The rea-
son why the subject is discussed using examples and logical
progressions accessible even to children is that Darwinism
is constructed upon unbelievable illogicality. Depicted as a
scientific theory, Darwinism is in fact an unbelievably illogi-
cal ideology.
People have now fully realized that Darwinism, the worst
scandal in the history of the world, is built around lies, hoaxes
and irrational claims. In the 21 st century, the whole world is
witnessing Darwinism’s collapse.

2 20 H Harun Yahya
0
a
Y
h
a
y
r
a
u

n