Page 93 - Islam: The Religion of Ease
P. 93

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)

         Australopithecus, which means "South African ape." These living
         beings are actually nothing but an old ape species that has be-
         come extinct. Extensive research done on various Australopithecus
         specimens by two world famous anatomists from England and
         the USA, namely, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles
         Oxnard, shows that these apes belonged to an ordinary ape
         species that became extinct and bore no resemblance to humans. 14
           Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolution as
         "homo," that is "man." According to their claim, the living beings
         in the Homo series are more developed than Australopithecus.
         Evolutionists devise a fanciful evolution scheme by arranging
         different fossils of these creatures in a particular order. This
         scheme is imaginary because it has never been proved that there
         is an evolutionary relation between these different classes. Ernst
         Mayr, one of the twentieth century's most important evolution-
         ists, contends in his book One Long Argument that "particularly
         historical [puzzles] such as the origin of life or of Homo sapiens,
         are extremely difficult and may even resist a final, satisfying ex-
         planation." 15
           By outlining the link chain as Australopithecus > Homo habilis
         > Homo erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionists imply that each of
         these species is one another's ancestor. However, recent findings
         of paleoanthropologists have revealed that Australopithecus,
         Homo habilis, and Homo erectus lived at different parts of the
         world at the same time. 16
           Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo
         erectus have lived up until very modern times. Homo sapiens ne-
         andarthalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens (modern man) co-ex-
         isted in the same region. 17
           This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of the claim
         that they are ancestors of one another. A paleontologist from

                                       91
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98