Page 102 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propagand‪a
P. 102

A DEFINITIVE REPLY
                                       TO EVOLUTIONIST
                                         PROPAGANDA


                   Richard Dawkins' Distortions

                   The Discovery Channel also devotes space to the claims of
               Richard Dawkins, an unrepentant Darwinist, atheist, and Oxford
               University zoologist. Dawkins considers all forms of cultural be-
               havior (ideas, gestures, etc.) under the heading of "meme." Dawkins
               describes memes as ideas passed on by one human being imitating
               another, and suggests that in the same way that the genes copy
               DNA and pass it on from person to person, the memes that consti-
               tute the mind and shape behavior are similarly copied and handed
               on from one person to another. The idea is that, just as the so-called
               competition between genes shaped biological evolution, so too the
               competition between memes shaped the brain and culture.
               Dawkins later suggests that memes—i.e., mimicry or assimilation—
               are the propulsive force behind human evolution.
                   The ideas Dawkins describes with the concept of memes can of
               course change and develop. For instance, ideas can be discussed
               and other ideas added as a result. Cultural progress can thus take
               place. In addition to this, human behavior and the behavior of other
               human beings may be imitated. There is nothing wrong with
               Dawkins' account up to this point. The error lies in suggesting that
               this is evidence for so-called human evolution. Mimicry is con-
               cerned with abstract thought. Man is the only being possessed of
               reason and capable of transmitting, copying, and developing ideas.
               No relationship based on mimicry can possibly be established be-
               tween man—who creates works of art, develops scientific theories,
               and designs and debates political regimes—and animals, bereft of
               all capacity for abstract thought. Instead of considering and defin-
               ing a property that is unique to man, Dawkins should first of all ex-
               plain how abstract thought might have emerged during the so-
               called transition from animal to man. What evolutionists are unable
               to explain is this: How is it that an animal that is unable to think or









                                             100
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107