Page 104 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propaganda
P. 104
A DEFINITIVE REPLY
TO EVOLUTIONIST
PROPAGANDA
speak and unable to establish detailed connections between itself
and its surroundings, could possibly turn into a human being able
to speak and think and possessed of reason and high intelligence?
By what evolutionary mechanism could this mental gulf have been
bridged?
Naturally, neither Dawkins nor other evolutionists have a con-
sistent reply to these questions. That is because it is impossible to
account for abstract thought by adopting a materialist approach, as
Colin McGinn has admitted.
Dawkins has no evidence at all of how so-called evolution
might have bridged this gulf, and his claim is a totally imaginary
one.
"If cultural heritage replicates itself, like DNA molecules, then a
new theory of Darwinism might emerge."
No further comment is made after The Discovery Channel puts
this suggestion forward. Yet, an explanation of what a cultural ac-
cumulation is and how human culture might emerge from the repli-
cation of such an accumulation needs to be made. For that reason,
these superficial statements have no meaning at all on the scientific
level.
Finally, the claim that there is competition between genes and
that this competition shaped biological evolution is invalidated by
the effect of chance mutation. Like all evolutionists, Dawkins has
adopted the dogmatic idea that the vast amount of information con-
cealed in DNA emerged by chance. Genetic research has demon-
strated that it is impossible for chance mutations to add information
to species' DNA and thus turn them into other species. You can read
about the scientific evidence for how mutations—the genetic
stronghold of evolution—actually put the theory into a quandary in
www.darwinismrefuted.com based on the works of Harun Yahya.
102
