Page 119 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propaganda
P. 119
HARUN YAHYA
panzees were related, based on genetic analyses. One piece of re-
search revealed that the genetic difference between man and chim-
7
panzees was three times greater than had been believed. The way
this piece of research widened that difference showed the invalidity
of the evolutionists' claims about genetic relationships.
Conclusion
As we have seen, there have been a large number of scientific
developments in a period of just six months that have clearly
demonstrated the invalidity of the theory of evolution with regard
to the origin of man. The History Channel must no longer hesitate
to confront the scientific facts it has sought to conceal. Instead of
blindly engaging in Darwinist propaganda, it must explain, clearly
and in full as a history channel, how the scientific discoveries of the
last 150 years have actually demolished Darwinism.
1. Pat Shipman, "Doubting Dmanisi," The American Scientist, November-
December 2000, p.491
2. MSNBC.com: "Fossil Discovery Upsets Theories on Human Origins," 4
July 2002
3. D. L. Parsell, "Skull Fossil From Chad Forces Rethinking of Human
Origins," National Geographic News, July 10, 2002
4. Henry Gee, "Face of Yesterday," The Guardian, 11 July 2002
5. Eurekalert.com: "Oldest Human Ancestor is (Again) Called into
Question," August 27, 2002
6. Richard Sadler, "Chimps on Two Legs Run Through Darwin's Theory,"
The Scotsman, September 13, 2002
7. Newscientist.com: "Human-chimp DNA difference trebled," September
23, 2002, http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992833
117
