Page 121 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propaganda
P. 121
HARUN YAHYA
he History Channel is broadcasting a film in its
Biography series, which deals with the life and
views of Charles Darwin. In this film, Charles
Darwin's unscientific views are defended on the
T basis of no evidence at all, as if they were proven
fact, and there is at the same time open atheistic propaganda. The
fact that a channel such as The History Channel, which claims to
give viewers the historical and scientific truth, should devote space
to Darwinist views, which are in no way compatible with the scien-
tific facts, casts a shadow over its credibility.
Why are They Trying to Keep
the Theory of Evolution Alive with Propaganda?
In recent weeks, a number of channels such as The History
Channel, The National Geographic Channel, and The Discovery
Channel have initiated an intense campaign of evolutionary propa-
ganda. Documentaries that discuss the theory of evolution and
praise Charles Darwin have been dusted off the shelves and
screened, as if a common decision to that end had been taken. What
is the reason for this? In our view, there is an attempt to repair the
damage that scientific discoveries have done to the theory of evolu-
tion in recent years, and especially in recent months. As followers of
the www.darwinism-watch.com website will know, discoveries in
the fields of paleontology, molecular biology, and genetics have re-
vealed a grave contradiction with the claims of the theory of evolu-
tion. Even evolutionists accept this. (You can find many instances of
this in the archives of www.darwinism-watch.com.)
It is actually quite natural that the theory of evolution should
have come to such an end. The real architect of the theory, Charles
Darwin, lived in the 19th century and was unaware of most of the
fields of science that exist in our time. For instance, since he was un-
aware of genetics, he believed that living species could be im-
119
