Page 248 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propagand‪a
P. 248

A DEFINITIVE REPLY
                                       TO EVOLUTIONIST
                                         PROPAGANDA


                   The Claim That Nutrition Played

                   an Evolutionary Role is Fictitious

                   The claim is put forward in the Scientific American article that
               "our ancestors'" progress in increasing the energy obtained from
               food and raising its nutritional quality was one of the main features
               in mankind's evolution and splitting away from the other primates.
               Yet from the scientific point of view, this claim is totally without
               foundation. Better-nourished living things may have stronger bod-
               ies, and may be healthier and live longer. However, improved nu-
               trition cannot cause them to turn into another species.
                   That is because there is no connection between nutrition and
               man's genetic make-up. In order for a "speciation event" to happen,
               the genetic structure needs to change to a considerable extent and to
               be redesigned. Such a thing has never, ever been observed in nature,
               and nutrition cannot affect genetic structure.
                   We can see this for ourselves: A cheetah community living in an






































                                              246
   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253