Page 52 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propagand‪a
P. 52

A DEFINITIVE REPLY
                                       TO EVOLUTIONIST
                                         PROPAGANDA


               telling. The most striking example of this appeared in the section
               about Homo erectus' power of speech. People enjoying the status of
               scientists gave their views, in all seriousness, regarding what mem-
               bers of the Homo erectus species talked about amongst themselves.
               According to the anthropologist Dr. Steven Mithen, when Homo erec-
               tus spoke, they engaged in gossip!  Another evolutionist scientist
               claimed that rather than gossiping, they talked about serving food!
                   Neither was this the limit of the stories related on NGC. These
               scientists were also somehow aware of a great many more details,
               such as what one migrating ape-man thought, and the fixed-
               thoughts possessed by yet another one. The odd thing is that these
               Darwinist mental gymnastics, devoid of any scientific foundations,
               were portrayed to the viewer as scientific fact.



                   The NGC's Visual Evolutionist Propaganda

                   Throughout the documentary on NGC, images of half-ape, half-
               man creatures hunting on the African savannah, eating, and mi-
               grating were shown. Those who imagined the NGC to be a scientific
               institution would have been deceived into thinking that these crea-
               tures were based on scientific evidence. The fact is, however, that
               just like the information provided, these images had been prepared
               solely on the basis of evolutionists' imaginations and the abilities of
               various artists.
                   Reconstructions are one of evolutionists' most important propa-
               ganda tools. The ape-man models and drawings seen in such docu-
               mentaries as this, and in evolutionist magazines and newspapers,
               are termed reconstructions. These are totally unscientific, and in no
               way reflect the truth, because it is impossible to obtain any infor-
               mation about a living thing's soft tissues on the basis of fossils.
               Reconstructions based on bone remains can only reveal the most
               general characteristics of the creature, since the really distinctive
               morphological features of any animal are soft tissues, which quickly






                                              50
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57