Page 54 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propaganda
P. 54
A DEFINITIVE REPLY
TO EVOLUTIONIST
PROPAGANDA
imaginary creatures might have talked about, it comes as no sur-
prise that they should also come up with models and drawings of
them. This is not science, however. It could only be a part of a sci-
ence fiction film. Evolutionists are not behaving like scientists. Like
fortune-tellers engaging in prophecies, they produce scenarios
about the past and future based on no evidence whatsoever.
Conclusion
NGC's documentary, which describes the so-called evolution of
man, offering no evidence but supplying details which can never be
known, is of absolutely no scientific value. The only place for this
documentary is in a science fiction movie or a screenwriter's fan-
tasies about human history. The way that the NGC broadcasts sce-
narios, which not even children could possibly find convincing,
under the guise of science casts a shadow over the institution's cred-
ibility.
1 - Solly Zuckerman, Beyond The Ivory Tower, New York: Toplinger
Publications, 1970, p. 75-94
2- Charles E. Oxnard, "The Place of Australopithecines in Human
Evolution: Grounds for Doubt," Nature, vol. 258, p. 389
3- Fred Spoor, Bernard Wood, Frans Zonneveld, "Implication of Early
Hominid Labyrinthine Morphology for Evolution of Human Bipedal
Locomotion," Nature, vol. 369, 23 June 1994, p. 645-648.
4- Isabelle Bourdial, "Adieu Lucy," Science et Vie, May 1999, no. 980, p. 52-62
5- Stokstad, E., "Hominid ancestors may have knuckle walked," Science
287(5461):2131, 2000
6- Marvin Lubenow, Bones of Contention, Grand Rapids, Baker, 1992, p. 83
7- Boyce Rensberger, The Washington Post, 19 November 1984
8- Richard Leakey, The Making of Mankind, London: Sphere Books, 1981, p.
62
9- Marvin Lubenow, Bones of Contention, Grand Rapids, Baker, 1992. p. 136
10 - Earnest A. Hooton, Up From The Ape, New York: McMillan, 1931, p. 332
52
