Page 77 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propagand‪a
P. 77

HARUN YAHYA



                               he Discovery Channel recently broadcast a docu-
                               mentary called  The Real Eve, in which imaginary
                               scenarios were put forward regarding the spread of
                               modern man, who allegedly emerged by means of
               T evolution in Africa, to the rest of the world.
                   However, scientific discoveries show that the evolution of man
               is nothing but a fantasy, and that the claims made on The Discovery
               Channel are unfounded. This article reveals the scientific errors
               made by the channel.
                   The program begins with the claim that all human races in exis-
               tence today are descended from one single woman who lived in
               Africa some 130,000 years ago, and that this woman was the first
               representative of Homo sapiens, who allegedly emerged through a
               process of evolution. Since these claims concerning this woman are
               based on analyses of mitochondrial DNA, this mythical female is
               known as "mitochondrial Eve."
                   It is suggested that these human beings, with their large brains,
               left the continent, maybe to find new resources, and began spread-
               ing to the rest of the world some 80,000 years ago. The likely mi-
               gration routes of one small group of humans, shown wearing prim-
               itive clothing, and the incidents that may have taken place during
               their journey, are depicted. Such issues as climate changes, the rela-
               tionship between Neanderthals and modern man, and a number of
               fossil discoveries are also discussed. The Darwinist message is that
               every person alive today is the product of evolution, and that the
               traces of this so-called evolution are to be found in our genes.
                   Yet the genetic facts said to confirm these claims are not actually
               objective scientific discoveries at all, but rather facts interpreted in
               the light of evolutionist prejudices. In other words, such interpreta-
               tions of genes have no realistic basis.
                   The clearest example of this is the concept of "mitochondrial
               DNA" (mtDNA), used as the springboard for the evolutionist
               claims in the program. Mitochondrial DNA analyses always take
               pride of place in the claims put forward on the program. The alle-




                                               75
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82