Page 78 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propagand‪a
P. 78

A DEFINITIVE REPLY
                                       TO EVOLUTIONIST
                                         PROPAGANDA


               gations that Homo sapiens emerged some 130,000 years ago in Africa
               and that the first Americans came to the continent 20,000 years ago,
               as well as the speculation regarding the migration routes taken by
               human beings as they spread out of Africa, are all based on mtDNA.
                   The fact is, however, that age analyses based on mitochondrial
               DNA have recently been scientifically disproved!
                   Until very recently, it was believed that mtDNA was passed on
               only by the mother, for which reason a woman's mtDNA could be
               followed down the generations. Evolutionary biologists frequently
               resorted to mtDNA analyses and used mtDNA to put forward spec-
               ulation about the origin of life. Yet due to their attachment to evo-
               lution as a dogma they interpreted mtDNA in a one-sided manner,
               and imposed the precondition that the differences between the var-
               ious examples of mtDNA they examined had to have come about by
               mutation.
                   However, a fact that emerged only last year has fundamentally
               undermined the credibility of these analyses.  An article entitled
               "Mitochondria can be inherited from both parents" in the well-
               known magazine  New Scientist described how 90% of the mito-
               chondria in one Danish patient had been passed down from the in-
               dividual's father. It thus emerged that all the mtDNA research em-
               ployed to support imaginary evolutionary scenarios was actually
               meaningless. New Scientist confessed this fact in these words:

                                                            Paleontological methods
                                                            based on the fossil record
                                                            and biological methods
                                                            based on mtDNA and Y-
                                                            chromosome analyses
                                                            yield extremely contradic-
                                                            tory results about the
                                                            dates of the human ori-
                                                            gins scenario. This is
                                                            natural, because, nei-
                                                            ther on the anatomic
                                                            level, nor on the mo-
                                                            lecular level, is any or-
                                                            ganism the "ancestor"
                                                            of another.



                                              76
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83