Page 187 - The Origin of Birds and Flight

o
n
s
a
t
i

A
r
c
o
f

t
t

r
r
e
n
e
s
e
n
p
r
e
b
a
s
y
x
s

a
o
n
e
d

r
g
e
e
h

a
o
i
e
l
p
n
t
T These different representations of Archaeopteryx based on a single
d
i
f
f
e
s
e
h

e
o
i
o
s
i
l
w
o
n

n
n
m
i
g
i
c
a
b
a
l
c
n
u
s
s
e
o

o
t
i
t
a
t
i
n

o
f
f fossil show how influential imaginations of evolutionist scientists can be in
e
s

u
t

i

e
l
t
o
n
i
w
f
s
h
s
e
n

l
a
i
n

i
v

i
t
s
s
h
i
t
c
l
u
n

i interrpreting fossil remains. These deceptive illustrations are of no scientific
l
e
t
e
n
f
i

o
i

r
a

e
s
r
e
i
t
r
s
f
t
o
c
n
p
a
n

e
i
e
m
g
.
r
p
s
s
e
e
i
d
f
n
a
o
c
n

l
s
o
i
h
e
T
i
s
t

i
v
s
e
t
n

a
a
a

d
u
l
o
l
r
f

p
u
e
p
e
u
a
y
e
i
t
i
r
n
r
d
c
h
v value, but are portrayed as so-called evidence to influence the public. .

u
c
e
b
e
n
b
e
t
d
i
v
e

l
,
t
s
c
t
o
o
s

e
-
e
l
e
a
l

c
e

d
h
o
v
e
s
r
t
e
e

a
l
s

e
h
r
h
e
w

a
H However, these methods reveal that t
t
o
e
,
v
m
t
i
i
a
r
D Darwinism is not aa science. There
n
e
w
e
e
e
n
.
T

c

t

o
n

h
m
c
i
s
i
s
r
s

e
n
c
s
c
i
b
c
h
n

m
r
e
a
n
a
e
y
o
f
a are many branches of science, ,

s
e

r

a

r
l
u
l
b but Darwinism is merely an illu- -

D
i
t
w

m
s

e
e
l
y
r
i
n
i
i
n
u

a
s
m

p
h
y
s sory philosophy. .
o
r
i
p
h
y
o
l
o
s