Page 191 - The Origin of Birds and Flight

ith the collapse of their claims about
Archaeopteryx, evolutionists are at a complete
dead-end regarding the origin of birds.
According to their claims, the Earth’s geologi-
cal strata should contain a great many odd fossil creatures bearing
the features of both reptiles and birds. Therefore, some evolutionists
have set about creating their own alleged intermediate forms, which
they have been unable to find elsewhere, by resorting to biased inter-
pretations and distortions.
The half-dinosaur, half-bird fossils described as those of “dino-
birds” introduced to the public in the 1990s, are a result of these
endeavors. By publishing drawings of these so-called dino-birds,
evolutionist media engaged in an international campaign of decep-
tion. Each of the so-called “intermediate form fossils” portrayed as
evidence for Darwinism was put forward with misleading explana-
tions, with no scientific reservations.
Subsequently, it emerged that this campaign was based on
fraud and distortion. But how can world-famous scientific journals
and television institutions turn biased interpretations of fossils into a
propaganda vehicle? How can they portray falsehoods uttered in the
name of science as “the greatest evidence for evolution”? The
answers lie hidden in the evolutionist fanaticism of these media
organizations.
Let us now examine some instances:

A HISTORIC EVOLUTIONIST FRAUD:

ARCAEORAPTOR LIANINGENSIS
Archaeoraptor liaoningensis was a counterfeit dino-bird fossil
alleged to be an intermediate form. The remains of this creature were
discovered in the Chinese province of Liaoning. Later, scientists
invited to analyze it raised doubts as to its authenticity. It was deter-