Page 196 - The Origin of Birds and Flight
P. 196

194                  The Origin of Birds and Flight

                     It has been realized that the animal described in scientific articles and
                     declared in  National Geographic magazine in November 1999 to be a
                     missing link between dinosaurs and birds, is a forgery. It has emerged
                     that the turkey-sized dino-bird skeleton known as Archaeoraptor liaon-
                     ongensis was actually an assembly of bones from other animals. It was
                     suggested that the dino-bird, assumed to shed light on an important
                     gap in the theory of evolution, was 125 million years old and found in
                     the Chinese province of Liaoning. Its feathered body looks like a bird,
                     although its long, bony tail was reminiscent of carnivorous dinosaurs.
                     An examination published in today’s edition of the British scientific
                     weekly magazine Nature has revealed that the dino-bird is a fabrica-
                     tion. A group of researchers including three paleontologists proved the
                     fabrication by means of computer tomography. The dino-bird was
                     actually the work of Chinese smugglers . . . [who] smugglers construct-
                     ed the dino-bird out of 88 bones using adhesives and plaster. The front
                     of the Archaeoraptor belonged to a single bird, while the body and tail
                     contained bones from four different species. Scanning of the dino-bird
                     by computer indicated that the bird skeleton belonged to previously
                     unknown species, and the dino part to new, small dinosaur species. 156
                     National Geographic, on the other hand, published only a very brief
                reference to this fabrication. This statement, by the vertebrate paleontol-
                ogist Xu Xing of the Beijing Chinese Academy of Sciences, appeared in
                the “Forum” section, toward the back of the magazine. Xu Xing’s letter
                contained the following statements:
                     After observing a new feathered dromaeosaur specimen in a private
                     collection and comparing it with the fossil known as Archaeoraptor, I
                     have concluded that Archaeoraptor is a composite. The tail portions of
                     the two fossils are identical, but other elements of the new specimen
                     are very different from Archaeoraptor, in fact more closely resembling
                     Sinornithosaurus. Though I do not want to believe it,  Archaeoraptor
                     appears to be composed of a dromaeosaur tail and a bird body.  157
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201