Page 45 - The Origin of Birds and Flight
P. 45

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)                   43

             Another opponent of the theory of evolution, the anatomist David
          Menton, said this about the origin of birds during the course of an inter-
          view:
             There are really two theories—you can’t test either, of course. The arbo-
             real theory and the cursorial theory. Each side is quite certain the other
             side is dead wrong, of course. Evolutionist John Ostrom speculates that
             feathers evolved from large scales on the forelimbs of dinosaurs and that
             these long feathers, as they developed, were used to catch insects. Also,
             they’re an incredibly complex structure to use just for this purpose. And
             they would blow the insect out of the way. Birds couldn’t clap their
             limbs together in front anyway—they just don’t have that kind of a
             shoulder. There’s no slightest evidence for either theory, and the peo-
             ple who take each view make that point. There are no examples of liv-
             ing or fossil scales that even remotely resemble a feather. Archaeopteryx
             has complete feathers like modern birds.  29
             The proponents of both theories have made their claims without bas-
          ing them on any valid foundation. The conclusion to be drawn is that
          evolutionists cannot account for the origin of birds at all.
             When it comes to the origin of birds, one most important point that
          evolutionists ignore is the irreducible complexity of the wing. Wings can
          function only when they possess all their perfect structures together:
          Structures such as a partial or deficient wing would have no function in
          terms of flight. In that case, the “gradual evolution” model, the major
          mechanism that evolution theory suggests, signifies nothing. (For
          details, see the section, “The Irreducible Complexity in Wings.”)


             EVOLUTIONIST EFFORTS TO PRODUCE AN ALTERNATE
             EXPLANATION
             Another evolutionist biologist, Kenneth Dial of Montana University,
          added a further speculative scenario to the interpretations already made.
          Though his claim received wide coverage in the world press in October
          2001, it totally lacked any scientific foundation.
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50