Page 121 - The Intellectual Struggle Against Darwinism
P. 121

HARUN YAHYA                         119


                   Throughout the world, there are various beliefs, worldviews
               and philosophies that may respect the existence of others not like
               themselves, seek to establish dialogue with them and to follow a
               "humane" path. Or else they may choose the path of conflict and

               try to secure an advantage for their own philosophy by damaging
               others not like themselves, in other words, to behave like animals.
                   The spread of terrorism in the world is the result of the sec-
               ond path. To combat terrorism, therefore, what needs to be done
               is to eliminate its fundamental basis: to engage in an intellectual
               struggle against Darwinism. Once Darwinism on the intellectual
               plane has been eliminated, terrorist organizations will collapse,
               because no scientific foundation remains to them. And the
               scourge of terror will finally come to an end.
                   But so long as efforts are made to preserve Darwinism, and
               as long as people are indoctrinated with Darwinist ideas, it will be
               impossible to put an end to terror. Teaching Darwinism in
               schools, we cannot be surprised at young people who join terror-
               ist organizations—because in order to become a terrorist, one
               must first believe that the other party is not fully human, that con-
               flict is a law of nature, that killing and murder are therefore legit-
               imized, and that one has no responsibility toward anyone else—
               in other words, one must accept Darwinism. It's meaningless to

               speak of love, tolerance, compassion or peace to anyone who was
               brought up for long years on the falsehoods that unconscious
               molecules combined to give rise to life, that they themselves are a
               species of animal, and that progress without conflict is impossi-
               ble. Neither asking how he manages ruthlessly killing innocent
               people can do any good. It is pointless to expect such an individ-
               ual to show any respect for others, to abide by the law, or to obey
               the state.


                                               O

                                                k
                                                  a
                                                  t
                                         d
                                       A Adnan  Oktar r
                                          n
                                             n
                                            a
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126