Page 13 - The Errors the American National Academy of Sciences
P. 13

I        n 1999, the National
                                         Academy of Sciences,
                               I USA, published a booklet
                    called  Science and Creationism: A View from the
                  National Academy of Sciences. The aim of this booklet was
                 to respond to the creation/evolution debate by bringing to-
                gether “the most important proofs” of evolution. The booklet
               was regarded as a most important source by evolutionists from
              all over the world. Evolutionist circles published the text free of
              charge on their Internet sites.
                  The advertising campaign set in motion about this booklet was
             such that anyone seeing it might well imagine that it was full of evi-
             dence for the theory of evolution and had put a definitive end to all
             discussion of the validity of the theory. However, those who expected
             to find such evidence in it were sadly disappointed. The booklet
             makes not a single mention of the Cambrian Period, the real subject of
             debate as regards the theory of evolution and which can never be ac-

              counted for in terms of the theory. Nor does it discuss such matters
              as the origin of the cell or human consciousness. Despite having
               been disproved time and time again by scientific findings, evolu-
                tionists’ classic claims were simply repeated in a superficial
                manner, with no evidence offered to support them.
                      We have already responded to the Academy’s booklet
                   several times in previous works and have shown, with
                    scientific evidence, that these claims are of no scien-
                      tific value. Yet the need has nevertheless arisen for
                        the preparation of a new study intended as a
                           response to that booklet. With this new
                              work, we wish to demonstrate
                                  how it is that the mem-
                                        bers of the
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18