Page 14 - The Errors the American National Academy of Sciences
P. 14

The Errors of the American National Academy of Sciences


             National Academy of Sciences, USA, one of the world’s most eminent
             evolutionist institutions, came to be unable to see the most obvious
             truth and to distort the evidence and knowingly support a lie, because
             of their fanatical devotion to Darwinism and materialism.
                  Those who read this book with an objective eye will once again see
             the truth in question—in other words the fact that the theory of evolu-
             tion is being supported with a blind and totally dogmatic determina-
             tion.
                  Yet how is it that these scientists continue to support a dogma left
             over from the nineteenth century with such dogged determination, in
             the face of all the scientific facts?
                  The reason is the materialist philosophy these scientists believe in.
             Materialism is a creed which maintains that only matter exists, and is
             equivalent to atheism. Atheists—in other words, those who would
             deny the existence of God and who reject religion, divine books and the
             infinite life in the hereafter—need a theory such as Darwinism to pro-

             vide an atheistic account of the origin of life. They realize that if
             Darwinism is disproved, then they will have to accept God, and there-
             fore also the existence of the hereafter and the fact that the prophets
             spoke the truth, for which reason they continue to put Darwinism for-
             ward with a blind fanaticism.
                  The mathematician and professor of astronomy Chandra
             Wickramasinghe is one of those scientists who have recognized this
             Darwinist fanaticism. He admits that:

                  From my earliest training as a scientist, I was very strongly brain-
                  washed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind of
                  deliberate creation. That notion has had to be painfully shed. At the
                  moment, I can’t find any rational argument to knock down the view
                  which argues for conversion to God. We used to have an open mind;
                  now we realize that the only logical answer to life is creation—and
                  not accidental random shuffling. 1
                  The evolutionist anthropologist Dr. Michael Walker has also ac-



                                               12
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19