Page 196 - The Errors the American National Academy of Sciences

The Errors of the American National Academy of Sciences

Scientific findings have proven
the evolutionist assumptions
regarding Lucy, the best-
known example of the genus
Australopithecus, to be un-
founded. In its February
1999 issue, the well-known
French scientific maga-
zine Science et Vie ac-
cepted this in an article
entitled "Adieu Lucy,"
and confirmed that
Australopithecus can-
not be considered an
ancestor of man.

e
c
e
o
v
u
n
c
E
e
a
h
he Myth of Molecular Evidence
M
y
d
t
M
T The Myth of Molecular Evidence
T Th e M y t h o f f M o l l e c u l l a r r E v i i d e n c e
o
h
e
n
o
H
u
m
or Human Evolution
F Fo r r H u m a n E v o l l u t t i i o n
F For Human Evolution
o
v
o
u
E
a
n
The NAS authors claim that data from molecular biology pro-
vides proof of the so-called evolution of man. This is yet another of
the NAS's unrealistic claims. We have already seen that molecular
biology does not provide evidence of evolution, and this chapter
will touch in brief on the way that the data from molecular biology
conflict with the claims of human evolution.
194