Page 199 - The Errors the American National Academy of Sciences

The NAS's Human Evolution Error

that interpretations based on molecular studies give results that are
14
totally at odds with studies of anatomical similarities. An article by
Henry Gee, which took this paper as a reference point and was pub-

lished in Nature, says:
Given that bones and teeth are, for practical purposes, all there is to
go on, uncertainty is likely to reign for some time, leaving the nature
of the latest common ancestor—and the general course of early ho-

minid evolution—as mysterious as ever. 15
In that same article, it is admitted that "the evolutionary relation-
ships remain murky."

T
G
d
m
n
e
a
A
u
p
H
t
m
h
e
a
m
C
T The Claim That Human and Ape Genomes
e
a
he Claim That Human and Ape Genomes
h
T Th e C l l a i i m T h a t H u m a n a n d A p e G e n o m e s
n
s
a
e
n
o

M
I
I

r
r

s
s
d
i
a
d
i
g
g
n
n
a
i
s
M
i
s
e
e
l
l
P
e
P

c
c
r
e
r
8
e
e
r
A Ar re 98 Percent Similar Is Misleading
A Are 98 Percent Similar Is Misleading
9
8
9

m
i
m
i
i
a
a
l
i
l
n
t
n
e
e
t
S
S

Another claim put forward by evolutionists on the genetic simi-
larity between man and ape is that there is a 98% similarity between
197