Page 182 - The Disasters Darwinism Brought To Humanity

182 T T H E D I S A S T E R S D A R W I N I S M B R O U G H T T O H U M A N I T Y Y
W
I
A
R
I
S
M
N
D
A
S
I
S
T
S

E
R
H
U
O

M
I
T
A
N
T
R
O

B
U
T

G
H
D
H
E

series were more developed than Australopithecus. Evolutionists lay the
fossils of these different living creatures back to back and make up an
imaginary plan of evolution. This plan is imaginary, because in actual fact
no evolutionary link between these different classes has been proven.
Ernst Mayr, one of the most important defenders of the theory of evoluti-
th
on in the 20 century accepts this, saying "the chain reaching as far as Ho-
mo sapiens is actually lost." 150
While writing out the plan Australopithecus>Homo habilis>Homo
erectus>Homo sapiens, evolutionists say that each species was the ances-
tor of the one that followed. Whereas the latest discoveries by palaeonto-
logists reveal that Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus li-
ved in the same periods in different regions of the world. 151
Furthermore, beings from the Homo erectus class survived until very
recent times: Homo sapiens neandertalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens
(modern man) have been found side by side in the same period. 152
This, of course, definitely demonstrates the invalidity that these clas-
ses were one another's' ancestors. Stephen Jay Gould, one of Harvard Uni-
versity's palaeontologists, although himself an evolutionist, explains the
dilemma in which the Darwinist theory finds itself in this way:
What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages of homi-
nids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. habilis), none cle-
arly derived from another? Moreover, none of the three display any evoluti-
onary trends during their tenure on earth. 153
In short, the drawings which appear in the media or in school books
of imaginary "half-monkey half-man" creatures, in other words the scena-
rio of human evolution which they are trying to keep alive just by propa-
ganda methods, is a myth with no scientific basis.
Despite being an evolutionist, Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of Britain's
most respected and well-known scientists, studied this matter for many
long years, and carried out a 15-year research into Australopithecus fos-
sils, and reached the conclusion that there was no real family tree stretc-
hing from those monkey-like creatures to man.
Zuckerman also made an interesting "spectrum of science." He drew