Page 179 - The Disasters Darwinism Brought To Humanity

E
H
E
P
O
I
T

C
S
I
O
M
C
N
T T H E M I S C O N C E P T I O N O F E V O L U T I O N N 179
L
O
O
U
T
I

F
O

V
E
N
rican geneticist B. G. Ranganathan explains it this way:
Mutations are small, random, and harmful. They rarely occur and the best
possibility is that they will be ineffectual. These four characteristics of muta-
tions imply that mutations cannot lead to an evolutionary development. A
random change in a highly specialised organism is either ineffectual or
harmful. A random change in a watch cannot improve the watch. It will
most probably harm it or at best be ineffectual. An earthquake does not imp-
rove the city, it brings destruction. 145
As a matter of fact no example of a useful mutation, in other words
one which developed genetic science, has so far been observed. It has be-
en seen that all mutations are harmful. It has been realised that the theory
of evolution's mutations, which it suggested as "evolutionary mecha-
nisms," are actually a genetic event which only destroy and cripple living
creatures. (The commonest mutation seen in human beings is cancer). Of
course a destructive mechanism cannot be an "evolutionary mechanism."
Natural selection, as Darwin had accepted, "can do nothing by itself." This
truth shows us that there is no "evolutionary mechanism" in nature. And
since there is no evolutionary mechanism, the imaginary period called
evolution cannot have existed.
The Fossil Record: No Sign of Intermediate Forms
The clearest proof that the scenario of the theory of evolution did not
happen is the fossil record.
According to the theory of evolution, living creatures arose from
each other. A previously existing species turned into another over time
and all species emerged in this way. According to the theory, this change
covered a period of millions of years and moved forward step by step.
This being the case, countless "intermediate species" should have
emerged and lived over this alleged period of change.
For example, in the past, although fish still bore their own features,
they must also have gained some features of reptiles, and half-fish half-
reptile creatures must have lived. Or, while still possessing the features of
reptiles, they must also have taken on some of the features of birds, and