Page 119 - Confessions of the Evolutionists
P. 119

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)                  117




            pelvic bone, which was shattered into tiny fragments just millimeters in

            size, in such a way as to show that it “could walk upright.”  The sole rea-
            son why the fossil concerned was chosen as the best suited candidate for
            the fictitious scenario of human evolution is that the pelvic bone could be
            reconstructed “as they wished” by Darwinist scientists. Darwinists did
            what was needed for the sake of Darwinism and Ardi was shamelessly
            presented to the world as an “upright monkey.” It was, without any
            qualms, depicted as the greatest evidence for the myth of human evolu-

            tion. But, like all the others , this furore was short-lived and the Darwinist
            fraud was quickly exposed. And in the example of Ardi, directly through
            statements by Darwinist scientists.
                 It is now time for them to apologise for Ardi.
                 William Jungers, the Darwinist departmental head of the anatom-
            ic sciences department at the Stony Brook, Long Island medical center,
            issued the following statement about the claims regarding Ardi being
            “the ancestor of man:”
                 I think some of the things they said might have been for effect. 301

                 Tim White, a Darwinist from the University of California who
            studied Ardi and suggested it represented a missing link in the fictitous
            evolution of man, and his colleagues were forced to make the following
            statement:
                 There are no apparent features sufficiently unique to warrant the exclu-
                 sion of Ar. ramidus as being ancestral to Australopithecus. 302
                 The fact that the pelvic bone, a collection of tiny fragments, and the

            surrounding area were reconstructed according to Darwinist scientists’
            preconceptions was openly expressed by other Darwinist scientists.
                 Jungers says this on the subject:
                 Maybe the pieces do fit together nicely, but the reality is they start out
                 with a very damaged specimen, and they end up with something very
                 similar to an australopithecine" (the group that includes "Lucy," the 3.2-
                 million-year-old  Australopithecus as well as a 2.7-million-year-old
                 Paranthropus)...  [Ardi] requires a lot of guesswork. 303
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124