Page 120 - Confessions of the Evolutionists

118 CONFESSIONS OF THE EVOLUTIONISTS

After examining the fossil, Jungers explicitly stated, “after working

with the fossils himself, there is no way that they could belong to an an-
imal that wasn't often walking on its hind legs," unless the data "were
deliberately ignored, or if we had made them up.” 304 ”By that statement,

Tim White and his team are admitting that they signed up to a new de-
ception in the name of Darwinism.
It is not only findings regarding the pelvic bone that give the lie to

the claims about Ardi. An article published in Science magazine said that
the anatomy of its foot revealed that Ardi was a climber. Another article,
by Katherine Harmon from Scientific American magazine, titled “How

Humanlike Was Ardi?” explicitly stated that a single fragment from a foot
was not sufficient to show that the animal stood erect. The feet, and par-
ticularly the big toes, exhibit features that still exist in present-day chim-
panzees and that are useful in climbing. Jungers summarizes this situa-

tion as follows:
(Ardi) it really doesn't show any adaptations for bipedalism at all. 305

Devoid of any evidence to support their claims, Darwinists are final-
ly resorting to this deception in order to be able to depict this life form as
a forebearer of human beings: “Its teeth are small, because while the
males were off hunting, the females looked after the young.” This des-

perate claim is in fact significant evidence of the despairing situation in
which Darwinists find themselves. Because they have no evidence, they
have no hesitation about resorting to demagoguery instead. It is a dis-

grace for a scientist to make such a claim and declare, on that basis, that a
literally flawless Bonobo chimpanzee is a forebearer of man. But even if
Darwinists disgrace themselves they still reiterate these feeble claims in
the name of their Darwinist ideology.