Page 180 - The Religion Of The Ignorant
P. 180

THE RELIGION OF THE IGNORANT

                 According to the unscientific supposition of this theory, every liv-
            ing species has sprung from a predecessor. A previously existing
            species turned into something else over time and all species have come
            into being in this way. In other words, this transformation proceeds
            gradually over millions of years.
                 Had this been the case, numerous intermediary species should
            have existed and lived within this long transformation period.
                 For instance, some half-fish/half-reptiles should have lived in the
            past which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish
            traits they already had. Or there should have existed some reptile-
            birds, which acquired some bird traits in addition to the reptilian traits
            they already had. Since these would be in a transitional phase, they
            should be disabled, defective, crippled living beings. Evolutionists
            refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in
            the past, as "transitional forms."
                 If such animals ever really existed, there should be millions and
            even billions of them in number and variety. More importantly, the
            remains of these strange creatures should be present in the fossil
            record. In The Origin of Species, Darwin explained:
                 If my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking
            most closely all of the species of the same group together must as-
            suredly have existed... Consequently, evidence of their former exis-
            tence could be found only amongst fossil remains. 10
                 However, Darwin was well aware that no fossils of these inter-
            mediate forms had yet been found. He regarded this as a major diffi-
            culty for his theory. In one chapter of his book titled "Difficulties on
            Theory," he wrote:
                 Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gra-
                 dations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms?
                 Why is not all nature in confusion instead of the species being, as
                 we see them, well defined?… But, as by this theory innumerable
                 transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them

                                           178
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185