Page 43 - New Research Demolishes Evolution

The reason Hoyle used the term "psychological" is the self-conditioning of evolution-
ists not to accept that life could have been created. These people have determined the
rejection of Allah's existence as their main target. For this reason alone, they go on
defending unreasonable scenarios which they also acknowledge to be impossible.

The Failure of Evolutionary Scenarios on the Origin of Life

The theory of evolution faces no greater crisis than on the point of explaining the
emergence of life. The reason is that organic molecules are so complex that their origin
cannot possibly be explained as being coincidental and it is manifestly impossible for an
organic cell to have been formed by chance.
Evolutionists confronted the question of the origin of life in the second quarter of the
20th century. One of the leading authorities of the theory of molecular evolution, the
Russian evolutionist Alexander I. Oparin, said this in his book The Origin of Life, which
was published in 1936:
Unfortunately, the origin of the cell remains a question which is actually the darkest
point of the complete evolution theory. 60
Since Oparin, evolutionists have performed countless experiments, conducted
research, and made observations to prove that a cell could have been formed by chance.
However, every such attempt only made clearer the complex design of the cell and thus
refuted the evolutionists' hypotheses even more. Stanley Miller's experiment of 1953 was
once regarded as an evidence for evolution in the molecular level, but after the 1970's, the
Miller experiment and similar evolutionary studies lost all their credibility due to the
findings about the early athmosphere. It was discovered that the early atmosphere was
very unsupportive of the formation of organic molecules.
In a 1988 article, Professor Klaus Dose, the president of the Institute of Biochemistry
at the University of Johannes Gutenberg, stated:
More than 30 years of experimentation on the origin of life in the fields of chemical
and molecular evolution have led to a better perception of the immensity of the prob-
lem of the origin of life on Earth rather than to its solution. At present all discussions
on principal theories and experiments in the field either end in stalemate or in a con-
fession of ignorance. 61
In a 1998 article, a statement came from the the renowned evolutionary geochemist
Jeffrey Bada of the San Diego Scripps Institute, which summarized the Darwinist failure
on the origin of life:
Today as we leave the twentieth century, we still face the biggest unsolved problem

HARUN YAHYA
41