Page 103 - The Evolution Deceit

The Sce nar io of Hu man Ev o lu tion 101

Furthermore, Homo sapiens neandarthalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens
(today’s man) also clearly co-existed. This situation apparently indicates
the invalidity of the claim that one is the ancestor of the other.
Intrinsically, all findings and scientific research have revealed that the
fossil record does not suggest an evolutionary process as evolutionists pro-
pose. The fossils, which evolutionists claim to be the ancestors of humans, in
fact belong either to different human races, or else to species of ape.
Then which fossils are human and which ones are apes? Is it ever pos-
sible for any one of them to be considered a transitional form? In order to
find the answers, let us have a closer look at each category.

Australopithecus: An Ape Species
The first category, the genus Australopithecus, means "southern ape",
as we have said. It is assumed that these creatures first appeared in Africa
about 4 million years ago, and lived until 1 million years ago. There are a
number of different species among the astralopithecines. Evolutionists as-
sume that the oldest Australopithecus species is A. Afarensis. After that
comes A. Africanus, and then A. Robustus, which has relatively bigger
bones. As for A. Boisei, some researchers accept it as a different species,
and others as a sub-species of A. Robustus.
All of the Australopithecus species are extinct apes that resemble
the apes of today. Their cranial capacities are the same or smaller than the
chimpanzees of our day. There are projecting parts in their hands and feet
which they used to climb trees, just like today's chimpanzees, and their
feet are built for grasping to hold onto branches. They are short (maximum
130 cm. (51 in.)) and just like today's chimpanzees, male Australopithecus is
larger than the female. Many other characteristics-such as the details in
their skulls, the closeness of their eyes, their sharp molar teeth, their
mandibular structure, their long arms, and their short legs-constitute evi-
dence that these creatures were no different from today's ape.
However, evolutionists claim that, although australopithecines have
the anatomy of apes, unlike apes, they walked upright like humans.
This claim that australopithecines walked upright is a view that has
been held by paleoanthropologists such as Richard Leakey and Donald C.
Johanson for decades. Yet many scientists who have carried out a great deal
of research on the skeletal structures of australopithecines have proved the