Page 125 - The Evolution Deceit

The Sce nar io of Hu man Ev o lu tion 123

A Human Mandible Aged 2.3 Million Years

Another example showing the invalid-
ity of the imaginary family tree de-
vised by evolutionists: a human
(Homo sapiens) mandible aged 2.3
million years. This mandible coded
A.L. 666-1 was unearthed in Hadar,
Ethiopia.

Evolutionist publications seek to
gloss it over by referring to it as "a
very startling discovery"... (D. Johan-
son, Blake Edgar, From Lucy to Lan-
guage, p.169)

portant fact. Evolutionists support their theory not based on scientific find-
ings, but in spite of them. Here we have a theory that is blindly defended
no matter what, with all new findings that cast the theory into doubt being
either ignored or distorted to support the theory.
Briefly, the theory of evolution is not science, but a dogma kept alive
despite science.

The Bipedalism Impasse of Evolution
Apart from the fossil record that we have dealt with so far, unbridge-
able anatomical gaps between men and apes also invalidate the fiction of
human evolution. One of these has to do with the manner of walking.
Human beings walk upright on two feet. This is a very special form of
locomotion not seen in any other mammalian species. Some other animals
do have a limited ability to move when they stand on their two hind feet.
Animals like bears and monkeys can move in this way only rarely, such as
when they want to reach a source of food, and even then only for a short
time. Normally, their skeletons lean forward and they walk on all fours.
Well, then, has bipedalism evolved from the quadrupedal gait of
apes, as evolutionists claim?
Of course not. Research has shown that the evolution of bipedalism
never occurred, nor is it possible for it to have done so. First of all, bipedal-
ism is not an evolutionary advantage. The way in which monkeys move is
much easier, faster, and more efficient than man's bipedal stride. Man can
neither move by jumping from tree to tree without descending to the