Page 122 - The Evolution Deceit

120 THE EVOLUTION DECEIT

A Hut 1.7 Million Years Old

There have been many findings demon-
strating that Homo sapiens dates back even ear-
lier than 800,000 years. One of them is a
discovery by Louis Leakey in the early 1970s in
Olduvai Gorge. Here, in the Bed II layer, Leakey
discovered that Australopithecus, Homo Habilis
and Homo erectus species had co-existed at the
Findings of a 1.7 million-
same time. What is even more interesting was a
year-old hut shocked the
structure Leakey found in the same layer (Bed scientific community. It
II). Here, he found the remains of a stone hut. looked like the huts used
by some Africans today.
The unusual aspect of the event was that this
construction, which is still used in some parts of Africa, could only have
been built by Homo sapiens! So, according to Leakey's findings, Australop-
ithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus and today’s man must have co-existed
95
approximately 1.7 million years ago. This discovery must surely invali-
date the evolutionary theory that claims that men evolved from ape-like
species such as Australopithecus.

Footprints of Today’s Man, 3.6 Million Years Old!
Indeed, some other discoveries trace the origins of present-day man
back to 1.7 million years ago. One of these important finds is the footprints
found in Laetoli, Tanzania, by Mary Leakey in 1977. These footprints were
found in a layer that was calculated to be 3.6 million years old, and more
importantly, they were no different from the footprints that a contempo-
rary man would leave.
The footprints found by Mary Leakey were later examined by a num-
ber of famous paleoanthropologists, such as Donald Johanson and Tim
White. The results were the same. White wrote:
Make no mistake about it, ...They are like modern human footprints. If one
were left in the sand of a California beach today, and a four-year old were
asked what it was, he would instantly say that somebody had walked there.
He wouldn't be able to tell it from a hundred other prints on the beach, nor
would you. 96
After examining the footprints, Louis Robbins from the University of
North California made the following comments: