Page 119 - The Evolution Deceit
P. 119

The Sce nar io of Hu man Ev o lu tion          117




                 Species Living in the Same Age as Their Ancestors
                 What we have investigated so far forms a clear picture: The scenario
            of "human evolution" is a complete fiction. In order for such a family tree
            to represent the truth, a gradual evolution from ape to man must have
            taken place and a fossil record of this process should be able to be found.
            In fact, however, there is a huge gap between apes and humans. Skeletal
            structures, cranial capacities, and such criteria as walking upright or bent
            sharply forward distinguish humans from apes. (We already mentioned
            that on the basis of recent research done in 1994 on the inner ear, Australo-
            pithecus and Homo habilis were reclassified as apes, while Homo erectus was
            reclassified as a fully modern human.)
                 Another significant finding proving that there can be no family-tree
            relationship among these different species is that species that are pre-
            sented as ancestors of others in fact lived concurrently. If, as evolutionists
            claim, Australopithecus changed into Homo habilis, which, in turn, turned
            into Homo erectus, the periods they lived in should necessarily have fol-
            lowed each other. However, there is no such chronological order to be seen
            in the fossil record.
                 According to evolutionist estimates, Australopithecus lived from 4 mil-
            lion up until 1 million years ago. The creatures classified as Homo habilis,
            on the other hand, are thought to have lived until 1.7 to 1.9 million years
            ago. Homo rudolfensis, which is said to have been more "advanced" than
            Homo habilis, is known to be as old as from 2.5 to 2.8 million years! That is
            to say, Homo rudolfensis is nearly 1 million years older than Homo habilis, of
            which it is alleged to have been the "ancestor". On the other hand, the age
            of Homo erectus goes as far back as 1.6-1.8 million years ago, which means
            that Homo erectus appeared on the earth in the same time frame as its so-
            called ancestor, Homo habilis.
                 Alan Walker confirms this fact by stating that "there is evidence from
            East Africa for late-surviving small Australopithecus individuals that
            were contemporaneous first with H. Habilis, then with H. erec-
            tus." Louis Leakey has found fossils of Australopithecus, Homo habilis and
                89
            Homo erectus almost next to each other in the Olduvai Gorge region of Tan-
            zania, in the Bed II layer. 90
                 There is definitely no such family tree. Stephen Jay Gould, who was a
            paleontologist from Harvard University, explained this deadlock faced by
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124