Page 115 - The Evolution Deceit
P. 115

The Sce nar io of Hu man Ev o lu tion          113



                              84
            like a Neanderthal." As we will see in the next chapter, Neanderthals are
            a modern human race. Therefore, Homo erectus is also a modern human
            race.
                 Even the evolutionist Richard Leakey states that the differences be-
            tween Homo erectus and modern man are no more than racial variance:
                 One would also see differences in the shape of the skull, in the degree of pro-
                 trusion of the face, the robustness of the brows and so on. These differences
                 are probably no more pronounced than we see today between the separate
                 geographical races of modern humans. Such biological variation arises
                 when populations are geographically separated from each other for signifi-
                 cant lengths of time. 85
                 Professor William Laughlin from the University of Connecticut made
            extensive anatomical examinations of Inuits and the people living on the
            Aleut islands, and noticed that these people were extraordinarily similar
            to Homo erectus. The conclusion Laughlin arrived at was that all these dis-
            tinct races were in fact different races of Homo sapiens (today’s man).
                 When we consider the vast differences that exist between remote groups
                 such as Eskimos and Bushmen, who are known to belong to the single
                 species of Homo sapiens, it seems justifiable to conclude that Sinanthropus [an
                 erectus specimen] belongs within this same diverse species. 86
                 It is now a more pronounced fact in the scientific community that
            Homo erectus is a superfluous taxon, and that fossils assigned to the Homo
            erectus class are actually not so different from
            Homo sapiens as to be considered a different
            species. In American Scientist, the discussions over
            this issue and the result of a conference held on
            the subject in 2000 were summarised in this way:
                 Most of the participants at the Senckenberg con-
                 ference got drawn into a flaming debate over the
                 taxonomic status of Homo erectus started by Mil-
                 ford Wolpoff of the University of Michigan, Alan
                 Thorne of the University of Canberra and their
                 colleagues. They argued forcefully that Homo erec-       IMAGINARY
                 tus had no validity as a species and should be           DRAWING
                 eliminated altogether. All members of the genus
                 Homo, from about 2 million years ago to the pre-
                                                            FALSE MASKS: Although
                 sent, were one highly variable, widely spread  no different from today’s
                 species, Homo sapiens, with no natural breaks or  man, Neanderthals are
                 subdivisions. The subject of the conference, Homo  still depicted as ape-like
                 erectus didn't exist. 87                   by evolutionists.
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120