Page 116 - The Evolution Deceit
P. 116

114                   THE EVOLUTION DECEIT



                 The conclusion reached by the scientists defending the abovemen-
            tioned thesis can be summarised as "Homo erectus is not a different species
            from Homo sapiens, but rather a race within Homo sapiens".
                 On the other hand, there is a huge gap between Homo erectus, a
            human race, and the apes that preceded Homo erectus in the "human evolu-
            tion" scenario, (Australopithecus, Homo Habilis, and Homo rudolfensis). This
            means that the first men appeared in the fossil record suddenly and with-
            out any prior evolutionary history. This is a most clear indication of their
            being created.
                 Yet, admitting this fact is totally against the dogmatic philosophy and
            ideology of evolutionists. As a result, they try to portray Homo erectus, a
            truly human race, as a half-ape creature. In their Homo erectus reconstruc-
            tions, they tenaciously draw simian features. On the other hand, with sim-
            ilar drawing methods, they humanise apes like Australopithecus or Homo
            Habilis. With this method, they seek to "approximate" apes and human be-
            ings and close the gap between these two distinct living classes.


                 Neanderthals
                 Neanderthals were human beings who suddenly appeared 100,000
            years ago in Europe, and who disappeared, or were assimilated by mixing
            with other races, quietly but quickly 35,000 years ago. Their only differ-
            ence from man of our day is that their skeletons are more robust and their
            cranial capacity slightly bigger.
                 Neanderthals were a human race, a fact which is admitted by almost
            everybody today. Evolutionists have tried very hard to present them as a
            "primitive species", yet all the findings indicate that they were no different
            from a "robust" man walking on the street today. A prominent authority
            on the subject, Erik Trinkaus, a paleoanthropologist from New Mexico
            University writes:
                 Detailed comparisons of Neanderthal skeletal remains with those of modern
                 humans have shown that there is nothing in Neanderthal anatomy that con-
                 clusively indicates locomotor, manipulative, intellectual, or linguistic abili-
                 ties inferior to those of modern humans. 88
                 Many contemporary researchers define Neanderthal man as a sub-
            species of present-day man and call him "Homo sapiens neandertalensis". The
            findings testify that Neanderthals buried their dead, fashioned musical in-
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121