Page 137 - The Evolution Deceit

The Mo lec u lar Im passe of Ev o lu tion 135

The chemical structure of even a single cythochrome-C protein (above left) is
too complex to be accounted for in terms of chance—so much so, in fact,
that the Turkish evolutionist biologist professor Ali Demirsoy admits that the
chance formation of a single cythochrome-C sequence "as unlikely as the
possibility of a monkey writing the history of humanity on a typewriter with-
out making any mistakes.”

exaggerated and do not reflect the true facts. That is not the case: these are
definite and concrete facts. No evolutionist can object to these numbers.
They accept that the probability of the coincidental formation of a single
protein is "as unlikely as the possibility of a monkey writing the history of
humanity on a typewriter without making any mistakes". 108 However, in-
stead of accepting the other explanation, which is creation, they go on de-
fending this impossibility.
This situation is in fact acknowledged by many evolutionists. For ex-
ample, Harold F. Blum, a prominent evolutionist scientist, states that "The
spontaneous formation of a polypeptide of the size of the smallest
known proteins seems beyond all probability." 109
Evolutionists claim that molecular evolution took place over a very
long period of time and that this made the impossible possible. Neverthe-
less, no matter how long the given period may be, it is not possible for
amino acids to form proteins by chance. William Stokes, an American ge-
ologist, admits this fact in his book Essentials of Earth History, writing that
the probability is so small "that it would not occur during billions of
years on billions of planets, each covered by a blanket of concentrated
watery solution of the necessary amino acids." 110
So what does all this mean? Perry Reeves, a professor of chemistry,
answers the question: