Page 193 - The Evolution Deceit
P. 193

Why Ev o lu tion ists' Claims Are Invalid        191



                 The Myth of Homology
                 Structural similarities between different species are called "homol-
            ogy" in biology. Evolutionists try to present those similarities as evidence
            for evolution.
                 Darwin thought that creatures with similar (homologous) organs had
            an evolutionary relationship with each other, and that these organs must
            have been inherited from a common ancestor. According to his assump-
            tion, both pigeons and eagles had wings; therefore, pigeons, eagles, and in-
            deed all other birds with wings were supposed to have evolved from a
            common ancestor.
                 Homology is a deceptive argument, advanced on the basis of no other
            evidence than an apparent physical resemblance. This argument has never
            once been verified by a single concrete discovery in all the years since Dar-
            win's day. Nowhere in the world has anyone come up with a fossil remain
            of the imaginary common ancestor of creatures with homologous struc-
            tures. Furthermore, the following issues make it clear that homology pro-
            vides no evidence that evolution ever occurred.
                 1. One finds homologous organs in creatures belonging to completely
            different phyla, among which evolutionists have not been able to establish
            any sort of evolutionary relationship;
                 2. The genetic codes of some creatures that have homologous organs
            are completely different from one another.
                 3. The embryological development of homologous organs in different
            creatures is completely different.
                 Let us now examine each of these points one by one.


                 Similar Organs in Entirely Different Living Species
                 There are a number of homologous organs shared by different groups
            among which evolutionists cannot establish any kind of evolutionary rela-
            tionship. Wings are one example. In addition to birds, we find wings on
            bats, which are mammals, and on insects and even on some dinosaurs,
            which are extinct reptiles. Not even evolutionists posit an evolutionary re-
            lationship or kinship among those four different groups of animals.
                 Another striking example is the amazing resemblance and the struc-
            tural similarity observed in the eyes of different creatures. For example, the
            octopus and man are two extremely different species, between which no
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198