Page 194 - The Evolution Deceit

192 THE EVOLUTION DECEIT

evolutionary relationship is likely even to be proposed, yet the eyes of both
are very much alike in terms of their structure and function. Not even evo-
lutionists try to account for the similarity of the eyes of the octopus and man
by positing a common ancestor. These and numerous other examples show
that the evolutionist claim based on resemblances is completely unscientific.
In fact, homologous organs should be a great embarrassment for evo-
lutionists. The famous evolutionist Frank Salisbury's confessions revealed
in his statements on how extremely different creatures came to have very
similar eyes underscores the impasse of homology:
Even something as complex as the eye has appeared several times; for ex-
ample, in the squid, the vertebrates, and the arthropods. It's bad enough ac-
counting for the origin of such things once, but the thought of producing
them several times according to the modern synthetic theory makes my
head swim. 167
There are many creatures which, despite their very similar physical
make-up, do not permit any claims of evolutionary relationship. Two large

Eagles, bats and insects all have wings.
Yet just because they possess similar or-
gans does not prove that they evolved
from any common ancestor.