Page 170 - The Error of the Evolution of Species

The Error of the Evolution
of Species

of only various combinations and distributions of genet-
ic information already existing in that species' gene pool.
Then how did living types first emerge? How did the
five kingdoms—monera, protista, fungus, plant and ani-
mal—emerge on Earth? How did the higher categories—
the phyla, classes, orders, families; and for that matter,
such basic categories as mammals, birds, vertebrates and
crustaceans—first appear? These are the questions that

evolutionists need to address.
As already stated, evolutionists refer to these subjects
as macro-evolution, which is actually what they mean by
the theory of evolution, because the genetic variations
that Darwinists insist on calling "micro-evolution" are bi-
ological phenomena that everyone can observe and
agree on. And no matter how much evolutionists employ

the term evolution in describing such phenomena, they
actually have nothing to do with evolution at all. On the
other hand, the macro-evolution claim, has no support-
ing evidence, either in biological observations or in the
fossil record.
People lacking sufficient information on the subject
may well fall into the error of thinking that "Since micro-
evolution takes place in a very short space of time,
macro-evolution could take place over tens of millions of

years." Some evolutionists fall into the exact same error

168