Page 174 - The Error of the Evolution of Species

The Error of the Evolution
of Species

he admitted this: "When we descend to details, we can
prove that no one species has changed." 201

Darwin hoped that the answers to these questions
would later be found and the formation of species proven

over the course of time and with further scientific research.
On the contrary, scientific discoveries have refuted Darwin
every time. Despite all the efforts made by evolutionists
over the intervening 150 years, speciation through evolu-
tionary mechanisms has remained devoid of any proof to
support it—as shown by honest confessions on the subject
by various evolutionists.
Although speciation is the backbone of the theory of
evolution, it is also a concept strikingly shrouded in dark-

ness. (More accurately, evolutionists possess no other evi-
dence than the examples of micro-evolution and variation
they have distorted.) For example, in a paper published in
1999, the Indiana University biologists Troy Wood and
Loren Reiseberg wrote that very little is known about the bi-
202
ological mechanisms that give rise to species formation. As
Professor Gareth Nelson of the American Museum of

Natural History admits, "The ‘species problem'' is perennial,
and speciation remains as much a black box as ever." 203
Cornell University's Professor Richard Harrison sets out
the latest position in an article published in Nature maga-
zine in 2001:

172